April 22nd. 2015.
Next
club meeting Monday 11th May
2015.
·
Propaganda & Inflation
from the Old Curiosity Shop By Derek Aldred.
Meetings are held
at the
Notices:
April Meeting
The April talk entitled Counterfeiting in Roman Britain and was
given by Hugh Williams. Hugh specialises in Roman coins and, particularly, the Carausian period (AD 286-296). Counterfeiting has a long
history, dating back to the C6 BC, contemporary with the earliest coinage, and
continuing to this day. The three main reasons are: (i)
creating a coin for less than face value; (ii) acute shortage of official
coinage in circulation, and (iii) non-monetary uses, such as tokens for
religious donations. For the first two, intended to deceive, they had to look
genuine and two methods were used: (a) with counterfeit dies producing a coin
in cheap metal, or struck on silver-plated blanks (fourrée),
and (b) by casting from genuine coins. Three major ‘epidemics’ were described.
In Britain during the Roman
period (AD43-410) both these methods were used, and others besides, such as
engraving new dies with imaginative and acceptable designs. At the time of the
invasion there were a number of old, low-silver and fourrée denarii in circulation.
Better coins often being hoarded, but importantly, there was an acute shortage
of small change, especially copper asses, for use by the newly monetised
economy. Within the empire in AD43 there was already a shortage and two
strategies dealt with this (a) widespread copying of Claudian
asses and the recirculation (after countermarking) of worn/ underweight bronze/
copper coins. The wear indicates widespread circulation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Claudius
As new AD42 |
Claudius As copy |
Claudius As copy !!! |
Countermarked Claudius Sestertius
back in circ. |
The silver coinage was
debased over the next two hundred years and this accelerated because of military
spending in the late C2nd and early C3rd. The impact on the denarius (the
mainstay coin) was marked. Copper, etc was added bring the silver content down
to 50% and below, the volume of fourrée coins was increased, and a new
coin was issued in AD214 (the antoninianus) which
purported to be a ‘double-denarius’ but with less silver than two denarii. Inflation was rampant, especially as the military
salaries were increased significantly with no new sources of silver to pay for
them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sept. Severus Den AD196 |
Caracalla fourrée AD201 |
Caracalla copper core AD204 |
Caracalla Antonianus AD216 |
The third epidemic was the
enormous issue of ‘barbarous radiates’. Generally dismissed by traditional
numismatists, the series offers challenges. Seen as a Britain/ Gaul phenomena,
these coins are exceptionally common in hoards and individual finds in the
period between, approximately AD260 to 272, and again between AD286 and 290,
particularly for emperors Claudius II, Victorinus and
Tetricus I & II, and Carausius.
The argument has been that they were produced for local circulation but
die-link studies have shown connections across the northern empire.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Victorinus AD270s |
Tetricus I AD270s |
Claudius II AD270s |
Carausius AD 290 |
Clearly, the style and content
of the coins were not designed to impress but they fulfilled a need.
Hugh explained that there
were other major outbreaks of counterfeiting, for example, at the time of Magnentius’ revolt (AD250-253) and copies/ copying
continued until the Roman administration departed in the early C5th.
The Club thanked Hugh for a
lucid account of the motivation and practice of counterfeiting during the Roman
occupation.
Future Events
Past Events
Club
Secretary.